Skip to content
Friday, October 23, 2026 · Today’s edition, 6:30 a.m. ETFri, Oct 23 · 6:30 a.m. editionSign inMy Desk 0EditionsSign in

Tax Foundation: bonus depreciation shifts corporate tax burden to economic profits

The Oct. 21 analysis says immediate expensing preserves a deduction's full value and removes the tax burden on the return needed to break even.

At a glance

  1. Expensing lets a firm deduct the full cost of a capital investment in the same year the asset starts being used.
  2. Expensing does not subsidize an investment that isn't worthwhile on its own merits, and it does not eliminate the tax on profit earned above the break-even return.
  3. The Tax Foundation writes that most commentary raising questions about how expensing interacts with data center and AI investment misunderstands the provision.

The Tax Foundation argues in an Oct. 21 analysis that permanent bonus depreciation for machinery and equipment and immediate expensing for R&D costs concentrate the corporate tax burden on economic profits. Both provisions were enacted under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Expensing lets a firm deduct the full cost of a capital investment in the same year the asset starts being used. Matching the deduction to the outlay preserves its value, the post says. Deductions taken in later years lose value to inflation and to the opportunity cost of the delay. That removes the tax code's penalty on the marginal investment, the project that only just covers its cost of capital.

Expensing does not subsidize an investment that isn't worthwhile on its own merits, and it does not eliminate the tax on profit earned above the break-even return. The Tax Foundation separates the normal return, the amount needed to break even, from the supernormal return that arises when a firm earns economic profits. Expensing takes the tax burden off the first; the second stays taxable.

The Tax Foundation writes that most commentary raising questions about how expensing interacts with data center and AI investment misunderstands the provision. It illustrates the point with two firms each putting $100 into an investment. It assumes 2 percent inflation and a 3 percent real discount rate, which it approximates at 5 percent. One firm's project just breaks even, returning $105 in year two.

The post frames the provisions as permanent features of the corporate code rather than temporary timing benefits.

Reported by The Book desk from Tax Foundation. Published . Corrections

Related

Advisors

Tax Foundation says California billionaire tax pitch keeps shifting

An Oct. 16 op-ed focuses on advocate Gabriel Zucman's description of Proposition 40 as a one-time levy, without offering a new revenue figure.

Advisors

Tax Foundation says Florida Amendment 3 would cut the local property tax base

The analysis says the amendment would leave the cost of local public services in place while removing a significant portion of that base.

Advisors

Washington voters to decide in November whether to block 9.9% tax on income above $1 million

The tax is not scheduled to take effect until 2028, and for some Seattle earners the combined top state and local rate could reach 18.037%.

Advisors

Treasury and IRS replace retirement plan correction framework and create IRA correction program

Revenue Procedure 2026-34 is effective today; Revenue Procedure 2026-33 begins May 1, 2027.

Advisors

Higher rates can cut closely held business valuations and open an estate-gift window

A lower supportable fair market value lets an owner move more ownership out of the estate while using less lifetime gift and estate tax exemption, though company facts still drive the appraisal.

Wealth Advisor Dailyfrom Private Wealth Daily

Practice management, recruiting, RIA M&A and the platforms advisors run on. Weekdays at 6:45 a.m. ET.

Free. Weekday mornings. Unsubscribe from any edition in one click.

From other sections