BNY Pershing retires Wove, folds it into wealth unit as Fitch lists cash-rate winners
The custodian will not say how many advisors use Wove; Fitch sees Schwab, LPL, Raymond James, Ameriprise and Stifel gaining from higher client cash rates.
BNY Pershing is done building a separately branded advisor platform, saying it will retire the Wove name and fold the technology into its broader wealth solutions unit, where advisors can choose custody from BNY or another custodian. The firm will not say how many advisors use Wove today, a silence that lands the same week Fitch named Charles Schwab, LPL Financial, Raymond James, Ameriprise and Stifel as the firms set to gain from higher rates on client cash.
Fitch's September 29 report also flagged higher deposit costs and cash sorting as offsets to the spread, the same shift visible in BNY's decision to fold Wove into its wealth unit: the value that once sat in a platform's user interface now sits in the deposit account behind it, and the firms Fitch names are the ones whose custody balances give them a direct claim on that spread.
For an advisor, the question has moved from which portal wins the next demo to where client cash sits, what the platform earns on it, and whether the next shelf fee or pricing change is already being built into the unified offering.
BNY's move gives advisors a unified wealth offering in place of a standalone platform brand, matching the custodian's view that its technology is a feature of custody. The refusal to disclose Wove's user count leaves the installed base unknown, since a platform that many advisors used would presumably carry a number worth defending and a platform retired without one suggests the standalone brand was not the draw.
Fitch's list spans five names across independent and employee channels, and the report ties expected earnings directly to deposit behavior. Higher deposit costs narrow the spread as clients move cash into higher-yielding options or outside products, and cash sorting—clients shifting from default sweeps into money funds or Treasuries—serves as a direct offset to the earnings Fitch expects. That makes it the variable to watch, because when a client moves cash from the default sweep to a purchased money fund or a Treasury, the account stays but the spread the platform earns changes. Fitch listing cash sorting as an offset means a custodian has a direct incentive to keep cash in the default product, which turns the advisor's decision about where client cash sits into a pricing question.
BNY's framing—a unified wealth offering with custody from BNY or a custodian of the advisor's choosing—tells advisors the technology can be delivered without a separate product decision. A software platform once sold as its own product is being absorbed into custody and cash as one business, where the advisor keeps access to the tools but the brand belongs to the custody relationship and the value accrues to whoever holds the account and the cash inside it.
The fee shelf is the next place to watch, because Merrill's updated Form ADV recently disclosed shelf fees as high as $1.4 million and an incentive to recommend products from firms that pay for data analytics. If the economics of platforms are shifting from software licenses to cash and distribution fees, the next pricing disclosure will come through the custody agreement rather than the technology contract.
Save this analysis and keep the funds you follow together in My Desk.
Sign in to save articles or follow funds.