When Keeping Your Options Open Is Riskier Than Making A Commitment - Kitces & Carl Ep 201
The episode offers a structured conversation about decision-making, including the cost of not deciding and the emotional cost of evaluating options. A wealth professional might spend time on it for its discussion of commitment and momentum.
Summary
By our deskIn episode 201 of Kitces & Carl, Michael Kitces and Carl Richards discuss the trade-off between making a decision and keeping options open, and when committing may make sense. The episode covers the cost of not deciding, the emotional cost of evaluating options, the benefits of making a choice and building momentum, and the case for removing “Option B” and fully committing.
- The episode discusses the cost of not making a decision.
- It examines the emotional cost of evaluating options.
- It covers the benefits of making a choice and building momentum.
- It makes the case for removing “Option B” and fully committing.
Similar items
Same topic Dr. Daniel Crosby - The Psychology of Financial Anxiety: Five Types of Anxious Clients and What Actually Calms Them | SDStandard Deviations with Dr. Daniel Crosby (Orion) |
 Ken Fisher: What High Gas Prices Do to the Economy | FIFisher Investments |
 Direct Lending: Strong Fundamentals, Shifting Dynamics | AAThe Allocation (Apollo) |
 Dimensional’s David Booth on How to Interpret Risk and 'Stay Calm' Amid Uncertainty | GSGoldman Sachs |
 Perpetual Futures versus 0DTE Options: Why the Comparison Doesn't Hold Up | CGCboe Global Markets |
Get the weekly 3 to watch
Free, in the Morning BriefEvery week the Morning Brief picks three videos and podcasts worth your time, with why each one matters.
Free. Every morning. Unsubscribe from any edition in one click.
Videos and podcasts are embedded from their publishers. Selections and summaries are editorial and are not investment advice.