Skip to content
Friday, October 23, 2026 · Today’s edition, 6:30 a.m. ETFri, Oct 23 · 6:30 a.m. editionSign inMy Desk 0EditionsSign in

Pentagon forecast becomes a rare-earth ETF pitch

Sprott's REXC packages a bet that U.S. demand for specialty magnets will outgrow China's 94% grip on production.

At a glance

  1. Supply is the harder fact.
  2. REXC is that wrapper with a defense-procurement stamp on it, where the demand schedule is set by budgets and geopolitics rather than the energy grid.
  3. The sharp caveat is the time lag: a budget forecast is not a purchase order, and a fund that owns producers will be priced by magnet prices and by which ex-China companies actually win Western supply contracts.

Rare earths have moved from a critical-minerals theme to a defense-procurement issue, and Sprott Asset Management is packaging that shift in an ETF, the Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC). The case, relayed by ETF Trends from Sprott senior portfolio manager and economic geologist Justin Tolman, rests on two numbers: global defense spending above $2.7 trillion a year, and a U.S. Department of Defense requirement of roughly 3,000 to 4,000 tonnes of specialized rare-earth magnets annually for missile guidance systems, radars, drones, and sonar — demand Tolman expects to reach about 10,000 tonnes by 2030.

Supply is the harder fact. China produces 94% of global rare-earth magnets, and non-Chinese output runs only about 20,000 to 25,000 tonnes a year, so the Pentagon's current requirement still fits inside that base — near term this is a concentration trade, not a demand-outstrips-supply crunch. Defense planners cannot leave a mission-critical input 94% dependent on Beijing, and a 10,000-tonne target for 2030 gives ex-China producers a procurement narrative worth pricing today.

That framing extends a point this publication made in late August, when it argued that critical-materials ETFs are the AI-power trade in a wrapper, pointing to Sprott's SETM. REXC is that wrapper with a defense-procurement stamp on it, where the demand schedule is set by budgets and geopolitics rather than the energy grid.

The sharp caveat is the time lag: a budget forecast is not a purchase order, and a fund that owns producers will be priced by magnet prices and by which ex-China companies actually win Western supply contracts. Thematic ETFs routinely ask investors to underwrite narratives years before the financial statements confirm them; a dated Pentagon requirement of 10,000 tonnes by 2030 is about as concrete as those narratives get.

Reported by The Tape desk from ETF Trends. Published . Corrections

Related

ETFs

Sprott's copper ETFs sell leverage; the metal sleeve buys it back

A 4.41% move in spot copper became 20.76% in junior miners, which leaves the hybrid fund in the middle of the shelf as the one advisors have to think hardest about.

ETFs

Sprott's uranium ETFs sell an AI story that spot hasn't confirmed

The nuclear pitch has migrated from tight supply to hyperscaler capital, and the funds now package each version of the demand case.

ETFs

Critical materials ETFs are the AI-power trade in a wrapper

Sprott's SETM sells diversification, but the demand story is the energy grid.

ETFs

Fidelity FYEE ETF reports 9.1% yield, 80-85% S&P capture

The fund's beta is about 0.79 and its payout target is 6-8%.

ETFs

Cboe options volume falls 4% as ETF options grow

Growth was concentrated in index and ETF options in a quarter when total volume fell 4%.

ETF Dailyfrom Private Wealth Daily

Flows, launches, fee moves and the funds advisors are adding to models. Weekdays at 6:55 a.m. ET.

Free. Weekday mornings. Unsubscribe from any edition in one click.

From other sections