Skip to content
Friday, October 23, 2026 · Today’s edition, 6:30 a.m. ETFri, Oct 23 · 6:30 a.m. editionSign inMy Desk 0EditionsSign in

MoneyGuide's annuity account types make the projection the new shelf

Put four annuity account types into the planning software advisers already open every day and the purchase decision moves upstream of the carrier's illustration.

At a glance

  1. The account types arrive in Envestnet's third technology release of the year, alongside updates to Tamarac and the firm's wealth management platform, and while the package is being read as a feature cycle, the annuity piece deserves a harder look.
  2. Modeling them at all forces the platform to take a position on how crediting gets projected, which suggests the defaults shipped in this release become the yardstick against which contracts are read inside the plan.
  3. Envestnet counted $614.9 billion in regulatory assets under management, per RCD's records, and reach is the point here: an account type that exists in MoneyGuide exists in the working vocabulary of every adviser who uses it.

MoneyGuide, Envestnet's financial planning platform, can now carry deferred-income annuities, fixed-index annuities, registered index-linked annuities and structured investments in a client's plan calculation. The account types arrive in Envestnet's third technology release of the year, alongside updates to Tamarac and the firm's wealth management platform, and while the package is being read as a feature cycle, the annuity piece deserves a harder look. Once a contract is a line item inside the software an adviser uses to build the plan — the software that produces the document the household is asked to follow — the adviser stops walking the household through an illustration and starts measuring the annuity against everything else the household owns. The comparison set moves with it.

That is a comparison the category has rarely enjoyed, because deferred-income annuities, fixed-index annuities, RILAs and structured investments share an awkward property: their outcomes are set by contract terms — caps, buffers, participation rates, crediting formulas — rather than by a ticker, so a projection built on expected return and volatility has no natural place to put them. Modeling them at all forces the platform to take a position on how crediting gets projected, which suggests the defaults shipped in this release become the yardstick against which contracts are read inside the plan. A yardstick that ships with the software travels further than any carrier's own illustration.

Envestnet counted $614.9 billion in regulatory assets under management, per RCD's records, and reach is the point here: an account type that exists in MoneyGuide exists in the working vocabulary of every adviser who uses it. The release also adds long-term-care analysis and streamlines navigation, attacking the same household problem from the opposite end, since a long-term-care event and an annuity payout are competing claims on one pool of savings — a plan that models one and approximates the other is guessing at the question it was built to answer. On Tamarac, the additions run to branded client-ready reports, trading data inside the CRM, an expanded Schwab Beneficiaries integration and access to MoneyGuide data, so the annuity a household models becomes the annuity someone at the firm can monitor. The wealth management platform picked up an interactive dashboard, a self-service configuration portal for unified managed portfolios and a wider widget library, which the announcement describes as the interface foundation for artificial-intelligence capabilities across the platform — and a system that cannot represent a contract cannot recommend one.

The same question, asked in a committee

The institutional half of the annuity problem surfaced the same week from Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. and Nestimate Inc., whose due-diligence tools for Nationwide Retirement Solutions evaluate target-date funds and lifetime income solutions side by side; retirement plan advisers call their Nationwide representative to run the reporting, then use it with sponsor clients to judge whether a plan's target-date option and its guaranteed-income option are suitable. Nestimate's Target-Date Fund IQ matches a plan's demographics and objectives against a glidepath design, measuring suitability and quantitative metrics, and the lifetime income tools cover stand-alone products, managed-account solutions and income built into a target-date fund. The demographic-fit scoring engine is the same one this publication covered in August, when PGIM put it in front of DC representatives.

Put the two announcements next to each other and the strategy is legible: guaranteed income is being pushed into the tools fiduciaries already trust, so it stops needing a search of its own. Target-date construction has become the sale, and managers selling off-the-shelf funds are losing the QDIA to rivals who assemble glidepaths inside the plan; Nestimate's framework makes that argument operational. Once an income sleeve is scored in the same demographic-fit terms as the glidepath, it joins the default conversation instead of waiting for a sponsor to raise it. The arrangement carries an unusual feature — the analytics travel through a carrier's sales force, so the relationship that brings the report is the relationship that brings products the report may rank — and plan committees will decide for themselves what that is worth. Either way, the tool's existence sets an expectation that the analysis gets done.

The counterexample sits with Equitable Holdings Inc., whose Structured Capital Strategies portfolio added what the company describes as the first bitcoin-linked index option inside a registered index-linked annuity: SCS Premier tracks the iShares Bitcoin Trust Exchange-Traded Fund and, per the announcement, is the first annuity option tied exclusively to bitcoin's performance without a dynamic allocation to equities, cash or other assets. One-year segments carry a choice of 10%, 15%, 20% and 40% buffers, with allocations generally limited to 25% of contract value; the carrier also lists diversified index strategies and a shorter segment duration.

Nothing there is exotic for a registered index-linked shelf, and the buffer menu is the interesting part: a 10% buffer and a 40% buffer behave like two different products inside a household projection, which makes the adviser's task a selection problem long before it is a sales problem. The differentiation is the index rather than the modelability, though, and that places the bet at the opposite end of the pipe from Envestnet's: a contract that cannot be typed into the projection competes on the strength of the story told in the meeting, while a contract that appears as a line item competes on the plan's own arithmetic. The fee-based shelf argument — that annuity distribution is consolidating onto the platforms advisers already work in, and that a carrier missing a shelf is locked out of the adviser channel before the menu conversation starts — now extends past the custodian to the planning tool itself. The release material does not say whether the new MoneyGuide account types arrive with platform-set crediting assumptions or require the adviser to enter them, and that difference decides whether a contract gets measured in the plan or merely mentioned beside it.

the adviser stops walking the household through an illustration and starts measuring the annuity against everything else the household owns

Reported by the Income & Annuities desk from PLANADVISER, RCD archive and RCD entity file: Envestnet. Published . Corrections

Related

Retirement

PGIM arms DC reps with Nestimate's target-date scoring tool

The analyzer scores target-date funds against a plan's workforce, putting demographic fit in front of plan committees as the next menu mandate takes shape.

Retirement

Vestwell staffs for disclosure; CITs get a distribution specialist

Two finance seats on a retirement platform's board and a one-woman CIT consultancy point at the same shift: the 401(k) business is spending on org charts and files, with the product decisions already made.

Retirement

AllianceBernstein hands its CEO job to its distribution chief

The succession puts a target-date and DC manager in the hands of an executive built on client coverage and private markets, leaving the retirement menu a defensive position.

Retirement

Capital Group paper lays out 4% to 5.5% withdrawal rates for target-date funds

The framework models a 30-year retirement, with fixed annual withdrawals starting at 4% to 4.5% and variable withdrawals at 5% to 5.5%.

Retirement

Capital Group publishes 4% to 5.5% target date withdrawal ranges

The Los Angeles manager also renamed its 2010 through 2025 target date funds to include "retirement income," pointing the funds at the spending phase.

Retirement Capital Dailyfrom Private Wealth Daily

Plan menus, in-plan income, rollovers and recordkeepers. Weekdays at 7:00 a.m. ET.

Free. Weekday mornings. Unsubscribe from any edition in one click.

From other sections