Skip to content
Friday, October 23, 2026 · Today’s edition, 6:30 a.m. ETFri, Oct 23 · 6:30 a.m. editionSign inMy Desk 0EditionsSign in

IRS allows estate buyback before trustee names charities

Private Letter Ruling 202625012 covers plans whose charitable share may go to a private foundation while the company holds a stock buyback option.

At a glance

  1. Private Letter Ruling 202625012, dated June 18, 2026, covers a related group of taxpayers who together owned a majority of a company's stock, according to WealthManagement.com's Tax Law Update.
  2. For a family office running this structure, the trustee's charity designation is the switch that decides whether the private foundation is a party to the buyback at all.
  3. Once the trustee directs assets to the foundation, the same dealing is between the foundation and a disqualified person.

A company can buy back estate stock without triggering self-dealing excise taxes if it exercises its option before the trustee names the charities receiving the charitable share, the IRS found.

Private Letter Ruling 202625012, dated June 18, 2026, covers a related group of taxpayers who together owned a majority of a company's stock, according to WealthManagement.com's Tax Law Update. The taxpayers, their estates, their revocable trusts and the trustees of those trusts were all disqualified persons with respect to a private foundation. Each revocable trust provided for a charitable share, designated irrevocably for charities the trustees would select, and based on the taxpayers' assets a significant portion of the company stock would land in that share. Separately, each taxpayer had given the company an option to buy stock from the estate, revocable trust or marital trust at fair market value set by appraisal. The taxpayers asked the IRS to confirm the plans would not run afoul of the self-dealing rules or trigger excise taxes.

For a family office running this structure, the trustee's charity designation is the switch that decides whether the private foundation is a party to the buyback at all. Before the trustee's irrevocable determination, the IRS concluded, the foundation had no interest in the estate or revocable trust; it had an interest only if and when the trustee directed some portion of the charitable share to it. During that window, exercising the options, or any other transaction with the family or the company, was not a transaction between disqualified persons and the foundation. Advisors whose clients hold a concentrated block earmarked for charity have a lever here that costs nothing to pull: the order of the two events.

Once the trustee directs assets to the foundation, the same dealing is between the foundation and a disqualified person. The IRS said that would be self-dealing but for the estate administration exception in Treasury Regulations Section 53.4941(d)-1(b)(3). As WealthManagement.com summarizes it, the exception covers transactions relating to property held in an estate or trust, and its first condition is that the transaction occur during the period of estate administration, prior to termination.

Trustees had six months after each death to decide which charities would benefit, the private foundation among them. For an estate whose charitable share is mostly one company's stock, that fixes two dates — the close of the designation window and the close of estate administration — and the buyback sits on different sides of the self-dealing line depending on which side of the first date it falls.

EventTiming under the plansSelf-dealing analysis
Company exercises buyback optionBefore trustee names charitiesNot a transaction with the private foundation; foundation had no interest
Trustee designates charitiesSix months after deathFoundation acquires its interest
Buyback or other dealing with the companyAfter designation, during estate administrationSelf-dealing unless the estate administration exception applies

Reported by the Family Office desk from WealthManagement.com, Tax Law Update: November 2026. Published . Corrections

Related

PWD View, OpinionThe Close

EP Wealth's Brian Parker says organic growth, not dealmaking, sets wealth managers' value

At an RIA Edge panel, Snowden Lane's Alison Burkett said a firm cannot rely only on recruiting and acquisitions.

PWD View, OpinionThe Close

WealthManagement.com column says Vanguard-Altruist deal raises the bar for human advice

The column argues clients arrive with AI-drafted analysis, shifting the meeting from advisor-produced research to judgment.

PWD View, OpinionThe Close

WealthManagement.com column argues family capital, not estate paperwork, decides whether $120 trillion transfer survives

Cerulli Associates estimates more than $120 trillion will pass down over 20 years, and the column says trusts and tax strategies alone do not prepare heirs.

Family Offices

Wells Fargo survey finds 61% of affluent adult children report inheritance conflict

Survey of more than 800 Boomer parents and nearly 800 adult children with at least $1 million in investable assets finds only 21% of parents report detailed estate conversations.

Family Offices

Rockefeller family-dynamics head says heirs need preparation, not just documents

Mallory Findley says families focus on trusts and tax returns because they are measurable, while relationships and preparation get less attention.

Private Wealth DailyThe morning edition

The private wealth industry in four minutes, every weekday at 6:30 a.m. ET. Free.

Free. Weekday mornings. Unsubscribe from any edition in one click.

From other sections