At a glance
- Antonia Godoy Arias, a policy and regulatory affairs analyst at Plusmining, said the gap comes from two different measures.
- For an allocator sizing Argentine lithium exposure, the approved mining list is $21.2 billion across 12 projects, with about $1.95 billion of that Chinese-attributable.
- As of Oct. 1, Argentina had approved 23 projects worth $49.8 billion under RIGI, including 12 mining developments valued at $21.2 billion, according to the Ministry of Economy.
Chinese companies account for 9.2% of the investment approved for Argentina's mining projects under its Large Investment Incentive Regime, or RIGI, according to a Plusmining analysis reported by Mining.com on Oct. 25.
That share sits far below an estimate linking Beijing to 70% of Argentina's planned lithium production. Antonia Godoy Arias, a policy and regulatory affairs analyst at Plusmining, said the gap comes from two different measures. The 70% figure counts announced lithium production capacity at projects with Chinese shareholders, including developments awaiting approval; the 9.2% measures ownership-weighted investment in projects already approved under RIGI.
For an allocator sizing Argentine lithium exposure, the approved mining list is $21.2 billion across 12 projects, with about $1.95 billion of that Chinese-attributable. A fund thesis, a co-investment memo and a listed miner's attributable exposure can each cite a different number and still be accurate on its own base — provided the memo states which base it is using.
The approved list, weighted
As of Oct. 1, Argentina had approved 23 projects worth $49.8 billion under RIGI, including 12 mining developments valued at $21.2 billion, according to the Ministry of Economy.
Plusmining calculated the ownership-weighted figures by multiplying each project's approved investment by the Chinese equity interest, according to the report. Applied across the 12 mining developments, that method produces the approximately $1.95 billion attributable to Chinese shareholders, counting both direct and indirect interests.
Project-level Chinese shareholders
Six of the 12 approved mining projects have identifiable Chinese equity exposure, although only three have direct Chinese shareholders.
Zijin Mining controls Tres Quebradas in Catamarca through Neo Lithium. Ganfeng Lithium holds 46.7% of the Cauchari-Olaroz expansion in Jujuy through Minera Exar. Shandong Gold owns 50% of phases eight and nine of the Veladero gold mine in San Juan.
The remaining three projects have indirect Chinese exposure through corporate ownership structures, without Chinese shareholders at the project level. Chinalco's approximately 11.23% holding in Rio Tinto creates attributable exposure to the Rincón and Fénix lithium projects. At Los Azules, that interest falls to roughly 1.8% because Rio Tinto's Nuton holds a stake in McEwen Copper, a subsidiary of McEwen Inc. According to Plusmining's analysis, the indirect holdings do not establish Chinese operational control.
What the difference costs an allocator
The other six approved mining projects show no identifiable Chinese equity exposure. Mining.com reports that Chinese companies have established a significant lithium position in Argentina, but that their financial exposure, operational control and rights to future production differ substantially across projects.
The two headline percentages therefore describe different populations: announced production capacity at projects with Chinese shareholders, approved or pending, against ownership-weighted capital in the 12 developments already approved under RIGI. If the 70% estimate holds, most of the Chinese position sits in capacity that RIGI approvals do not yet cover — which would make the approved list the smaller and more certain half of the exposure, and the pending queue the part a diligence file still has to size.
Which leaves the prior diligence question for a selector: whether a China-linked lithium exposure is being underwritten for attributable capital, for operating control, or for offtake rights. On Plusmining's count, only the first is concentrated at project level.
Reported by the Natural Resources desk from Mining.com. Published . Updated Oct 25, 2026 · 7:01 p.m. ET. Corrections