Skip to content
Friday, October 23, 2026 · Today’s edition, 6:30 a.m. ETFri, Oct 23 · 6:30 a.m. editionSign inMy Desk 0EditionsSign in

Switzerland proposes EU-aligned corporate sustainability act

Large Swiss companies would face EU-aligned due diligence and reporting, with an explicit pledge not to exceed Brussels' rules.

At a glance

  1. The draft is an indirect counter-proposal to the Responsible Business Initiative, a citizens' initiative the government considers overreaching and a threat to Swiss competitiveness.
  2. The government says the aim is a coherent framework that fits international norms.
  3. The act works in two tiers.

Switzerland's Federal Council has opened consultations on a Sustainable Corporate Management Act that would bring the country's largest companies under EU-style due-diligence and reporting rules, according to ESG News. The draft is an indirect counter-proposal to the Responsible Business Initiative, a citizens' initiative the government considers overreaching and a threat to Swiss competitiveness.

The government says the aim is a coherent framework that fits international norms. The text tracks the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, its Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, and the Omnibus Directive. It is equally explicit about the ceiling: no exceeding EU requirements. Regulatory equivalence is the goal, with an eye to keeping Swiss firms from losing ground in global markets.

Size tests, and a supply-chain catch

The act works in two tiers. The first imposes risk-based due-diligence duties on the very largest enterprises. A Swiss-based group qualifies if it has more than 5,000 full-time employees. It must also show global turnover above CHF 1.5 billion for two consecutive years, or pass thresholds tied to franchise and licensing income. Foreign companies are captured when their Swiss operations reach a similar scale.

Those companies would have to adopt a sustainability strategy and a code of conduct. They would identify and prioritize adverse impacts on the environment and human rights, then apply preventive and corrective measures. Grievance mechanisms would be mandatory, as would annual due-diligence reports.

A second, broader tier applies to companies with more than 1,000 employees. Their turnover must top CHF 450 million. These firms would file sustainability reports and undergo audits. Disclosures would follow EU standards or equivalent frameworks, with limited third-party assurance.

Scale is not the only trigger. The SCMA also attaches requirements to specific activities — conflict minerals and child labour — regardless of company size. Smaller firms sitting in those supply chains get compliance duties even though the act does not target SMEs directly. The government acknowledges they will feel indirect pressure anyway, via contract terms imposed by larger partners.

The political logic is plain. A moderate alternative to the Responsible Business Initiative lets the government claim real oversight while arguing it has saved Swiss competitiveness. The explicit nod to the Omnibus Directive shows Bern is calibrating to the EU regime as Brussels simplifies it. Practical, yes, and a way to brand the act as Brussels-compatible.

For asset managers, the proposal would bring EU-aligned reporting data to Swiss companies outside the bloc's direct reach. A portfolio company now filing no EU-aligned report would, under the act, disclose against the same standards. Cross-border ESG comparisons get easier for fund managers with European portfolios.

The open question is who judges equivalence. The act binds Swiss compliance to EU standards, but equivalence regimes are not symmetric: the rule-maker holds the pen. Switzerland is betting that aligning to the letter of CSRD and CSDDD costs less than fighting it. The consultation will show whether that bet pays off politically.

Reported by the Policy & Disclosure desk from ESG News. Published . Corrections

Related

Sustainable Investing

FCA drops plans for mandatory IFRS-based climate reporting as EU anti-greenwashing rules take effect

ESG Today's week-in-review places the change next to ISO's proposed net zero standard failing an initial vote and Vanguard's finding on younger investors' ESG voting choices.

Sustainable Investing

EU Parliament backs delay to methane import rules to May 2031

The compliance deadline would move to May 31, 2031 from January 1, 2027, but EU governments must still agree the final date.

Sustainable Investing

ISSB proposes nature-related disclosures under IFRS S1 with no effective date

Consultation runs to 19 February 2027; companies could claim compliance with ISSB Standards without following the proposed Practice Statement.

Sustainable Investing

HKEX opens Green Equity applications for Hong Kong-listed companies

The voluntary designation is assessed by HKEX-approved Recognised Reviewers and requires annual reassessment; ESG News did not report application costs or assessment timelines.

Sustainable Investing

HKEX opens green label with a 50% revenue test

Companies must keep fossil-fuel revenue and investment below 5%, requalify annually, and be assessed by HKEX-approved reviewers.

ESG Capital Dailyfrom Private Wealth Daily

Transition funds, stewardship and the rules behind sustainable labels. Weekdays at 7:10 a.m. ET.

Free. Weekday mornings. Unsubscribe from any edition in one click.

From other sections