At a glance
- Noland has worked the transaction side at a hospitality investor, the placement side at JLL, and the credit side in banking, a breadth that suggests Noble wants someone who can translate between the asset and the loan rather than a pure deal sourcer.
- The asset-realization mandate matters because the sale decision and the refinancing decision are not separate at a sponsor: if a loan can be reworked, the hold gets longer; if it cannot, the asset gets marketed.
- Noble is doubling down on the balance sheet side, which is the right bet when the next cycle's returns will be determined by how well a sponsor funds its existing assets, not by how many new deals it can put into contract.
With the refinancing wall bearing down on hospitality owners, Noble Investment Group has hired Matt Noland as director of capital markets, IREI first reported, assigning him debt origination and management and strategic asset realizations across Noble's portfolio — in practice, pairing the firm's borrowing with its sale schedule. Noland joins from Peachtree Group, where he handled portfolio management and the execution of hospitality investment transactions, including hotel acquisitions and dispositions; earlier, he supported the placement of nearly $1 billion of debt and equity capital for acquisitions, refinancings, and ground-up developments at JLL's debt capital markets team, and he also held credit and investment banking roles at Truist Securities and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey.
Noland has worked the transaction side at a hospitality investor, the placement side at JLL, and the credit side in banking, a breadth that suggests Noble wants someone who can translate between the asset and the loan rather than a pure deal sourcer. His career has run through the liability side and the exit side, which is how a firm looks when it is preparing for the refinancing wall. The wall is being dismantled loan by loan with structured capital, not cleared by distress auctions, and a dedicated capital markets director is the practical form of that work: someone who can manage lender relationships, refinance what can be refinanced, and realize assets that no longer pencil.
The asset-realization mandate matters because the sale decision and the refinancing decision are not separate at a sponsor: if a loan can be reworked, the hold gets longer; if it cannot, the asset gets marketed. Assigning both to one director suggests Noble wants those calls made in the same room.
Meanwhile, Peachtree passed $525 million in DSTs with hotel and industrial deals earlier this month, per PRED's records, a model that raises investor money through DSTs rather than organizing around a sponsor's debt book and a sharp contrast with the buildout underway at Noble. Noble is doubling down on the balance sheet side, which is the right bet when the next cycle's returns will be determined by how well a sponsor funds its existing assets, not by how many new deals it can put into contract.
Reported by the Real estate debt desk from IREI and PRED archive. Published . Corrections