At a glance
- The subject remains Treasury rules restricting U.S. outbound investment in countries of concern, which the LSTA notes have not changed since the spring.
- The change in label carries some weight: an exposure draft is circulated for comment, while a market advisory is the version members are meant to work from.
- The full document sits behind a member login; the accessible text describes its scope, records that the regulations remain unmodified, and stops.
The LSTA has taken its outbound-investment guidance out of exposure-draft status with a September 30 Market Advisory updating the May 4 Exposure Draft. The subject remains Treasury rules restricting U.S. outbound investment in countries of concern, which the LSTA notes have not changed since the spring. What has moved is the group's account of what comes next. According to the advisory, two significant developments have occurred in the interim, one or both of which will result in amendments to the regulations. The public summary does not identify them.
The change in label carries some weight: an exposure draft is circulated for comment, while a market advisory is the version members are meant to work from. The provisions it offers are examples of language members may include, where relevant, in credit agreements and in security or pledge agreements, as applicable. That is where outbound-investment restrictions surface for a direct lender — as drafting choices inside the loan paper, sitting alongside the representations and covenants the deal team is already negotiating rather than in a separate compliance document. The LSTA's framing is permissive rather than mandatory: the examples are there to be used where a deal touches the rules, not imposed across a portfolio.
The full document sits behind a member login; the accessible text describes its scope, records that the regulations remain unmodified, and stops. It does not name the countries covered by the restrictions or say what form the amendments will take. Members are therefore drafting against model language for a rule set their trade group says is about to be rewritten, without the specifics of what is driving the rewrite.
Two iterations in five months is a brisk cycle for standard documentation, and if the regulations are amended as the LSTA expects, a further pass on the examples follows. That means provisions papered off the September version could be amended before the deals carrying them have closed — an ordinary cost of drafting ahead of a rule change, but one that lands on the same clause set twice.
For a lender with an outbound-sensitive deal in the pipeline, the choice is whether to paper the September examples now and amend later, or wait for the version that follows the regulations. The LSTA has said amendments are coming; it has not said when.
Reported by the Direct Lending desk from LSTA News. Published . Corrections