Skip to content
Friday, October 23, 2026 · Today’s edition, 6:30 a.m. ETFri, Oct 23 · 6:30 a.m. editionSign inMy Desk 0EditionsSign in

LAPFF and CCLA press FTSE 100 holdouts for sixth year

One in five FTSE 100 companies now puts a transition plan to a shareholder vote; BP, Barclays and Lloyds are the notable absentees.

At a glance

  1. The Local Government Pension Scheme's stewardship body and fund manager CCLA are again gathering fellow investors to back resolutions that would put those plans on the ballot.
  2. The pressure is showing results.
  3. CCLA's Tessa Younger frames the vote as a mechanism for investors to assess whether a company's pathway is credible.

Net Zero Investor reports that LAPFF and CCLA are in their sixth year of pressing FTSE 100 companies to put climate transition plans to a shareholder vote. The Local Government Pension Scheme's stewardship body and fund manager CCLA are again gathering fellow investors to back resolutions that would put those plans on the ballot. Last year's supporters included Nordea, Brunel and the Church Commissioners for England, representing £3.1trn in assets under management.

The pressure is showing results. Around one in five FTSE 100 companies now offers a dedicated vote on its transition plan. Unilever, London Stock Exchange Group, Centrica and Rio Tinto are on that list, and such votes have generally drawn support from more than 90% of shareholders. Still absent, as Net Zero Investor notes, are the major financials and energy giants. BP last consulted shareholders on its climate plan in 2022 and has since announced a significant reversal of its ambitions; Barclays and Lloyds have so far offered no vote on their climate strategies.

The absent names

CCLA's Tessa Younger frames the vote as a mechanism for investors to assess whether a company's pathway is credible. LAPFF chair Doug McMurdo argues the physical costs of climate change are already reaching communities and will hit the bottom lines of companies. The near-universal support is what gives the exercise force: once shareholders approve a plan, walking it back means publicly reversing a voted-on commitment rather than quietly revising in the boardroom. The oil and gas majors and big lenders sitting it out appear to grasp that.

Reported by the Policy & Disclosure desk from Net Zero Investor. Published . Corrections

Related

Sustainable Investing

FTSE 100 climate-vote campaign enters its sixth year

LAPFF and CCLA renew their push for shareholder votes on corporate climate plans; investors managing £3.1trn backed last year's effort.

Sustainable Investing

Italy completes €8bn green bond sale with €110bn order book

Proceeds will be split across all six categories in the framework Italy updated in late 2025, with building efficiency and transport taking the largest shares.

Sustainable Investing

Urgewald finds UK banks lent $8.3bn to coal as European lending fell 46%

Barclays and HSBC are named among the banks that increased exposure over 2022–2025, as Brussels weighs a delay to methane rules on imported oil and gas.

Sustainable Investing

EU Parliament backs delay to methane import rules to May 2031

The compliance deadline would move to May 31, 2031 from January 1, 2027, but EU governments must still agree the final date.

Sustainable Investing

ISSB proposes nature-related disclosures under IFRS S1 with no effective date

Consultation runs to 19 February 2027; companies could claim compliance with ISSB Standards without following the proposed Practice Statement.

ESG Capital Dailyfrom Private Wealth Daily

Transition funds, stewardship and the rules behind sustainable labels. Weekdays at 7:10 a.m. ET.

Free. Weekday mornings. Unsubscribe from any edition in one click.

From other sections