Skip to content
Friday, October 23, 2026 · Today’s edition, 6:30 a.m. ETFri, Oct 23 · 6:30 a.m. editionSign inMy Desk 0EditionsSign in

DOL proposes extending e-delivery rules to group health plans

Group health plan sponsors could gain the same electronic delivery path retirement plans have had since 2020.

At a glance

  1. Groom Law principal Lisa Campbell told Law360 the proposal “seems like a good step forward for electronic disclosure.”
  2. The 2020 rule did not apply to group health plans, and Campbell said that created “a lot of disappointment” among stakeholders.
  3. Campbell, as summarized by Groom, expects the proposal to bring similar efficiencies to group health plans.

The Labor Department has proposed extending its electronic-delivery framework to group health plans, building on the e-delivery rule it wrote for retirement plans in 2020. Groom Law principal Lisa Campbell told Law360 the proposal “seems like a good step forward for electronic disclosure.”

The 2020 rule did not apply to group health plans, and Campbell said that created “a lot of disappointment” among stakeholders. They had hoped the new proposal would closely mirror the retirement plan framework, according to Groom’s summary of the Law360 article.

Campbell, as summarized by Groom, expects the proposal to bring similar efficiencies to group health plans. For advisers who work with plan sponsors, the practical appeal is uniformity: the systems and workflows built for retirement plan e-delivery could serve the health plan side too, so an employer runs one e-delivery operation instead of two. On the retirement side, those systems were a new cost and a new discipline when the 2020 rule landed; reusing them for health plans would spread that cost over a wider base.

Whether the new proposal actually mirrors the retirement framework is not shown in the Groom brief, which quotes Campbell but does not reproduce the proposal’s terms. What is on the record is Law360’s headline, “DOL E-Delivery Push Pleases Mgmt. And Worker Attys Alike.” An ERISA rule that both sides of the bar welcome publicly is uncommon; management and worker attorneys usually square off when disclosure rules change.

The next thing to watch is the final rule’s text: whether it mirrors the retirement framework or shaves off pieces for the health plan context. If the final rule matches the framework, benefits advisers get a ready efficiency story for clients. If it does not, they keep running two disclosure tracks.

Reported by the Policy & ERISA desk from Groom Law — Benefits Brief. Published . Corrections

Related

Retirement

Groom's new hire bets ERISA's next fight is the plan menu

A résumé that runs from EBSA enforcement through in-house product counsel at three providers shows where retirement law is being repriced.

Retirement

Zero-balance 403(b) staff may still count on Form 5500, Groom attorneys say

The 2023 change generally excludes eligible zero-balance employees from the status count, but other Form 5500 lines may still require them, the attorneys say.

Retirement

Eleventh Circuit ends ERISA exhaustion for statutory claims

Groom Law says the unanimous ruling leaves the exhaustion requirement in place for most denial-of-benefits claims.

Retirement

IRS replaces EPCRS revenue procedure and launches IRA correction system

Revenue Procedure 2026-34 took effect the day it was announced; the new IRA program will take over 60-day rollover waiver requests during 2027 and 2028.

Retirement

Musk pledges one SpaceX share per child as Trump Account rules are debated

Aon's Grace Lattyak told a Treasury and IRS hearing that proposed rules may shortchange children of divorced or separated parents.

Retirement Capital Dailyfrom Private Wealth Daily

Plan menus, in-plan income, rollovers and recordkeepers. Weekdays at 7:00 a.m. ET.

Free. Weekday mornings. Unsubscribe from any edition in one click.

From other sections