At a glance
- The loan pays off a prior first-lien note that had passed its maturity date while the sponsor stayed current, and the existing subordinate liens were consolidated into a single junior position.
- The restaurants are open and paying rent, he said, on leases that run into the 2030s, and the complication “sat above the assets, in a capital stack that had gotten more complicated than the properties themselves.”
- At 60% LTV, the advance rate can absorb a softer sale price while the income stream is not the point of stress, and the properties' leases extend years beyond the loan itself, so the structure reads as first-lien money rather than a rescue of a broken asset.
Avatar Financial Group has originated a $5.1 million bridge loan against two freestanding, net-leased Jack in the Box restaurants in Redding and Grass Valley, California, Connect CRE reported, with the first-lien financing running two years at roughly 60% loan-to-value. The loan pays off a prior first-lien note that had passed its maturity date while the sponsor stayed current, and the existing subordinate liens were consolidated into a single junior position.
“This was a loan-maturity problem, not a property-performance problem,” Avatar president and co-founder T.R. Hazelrigg IV told Connect CRE. The restaurants are open and paying rent, he said, on leases that run into the 2030s, and the complication “sat above the assets, in a capital stack that had gotten more complicated than the properties themselves.”
At 60% LTV, the advance rate can absorb a softer sale price while the income stream is not the point of stress, and the properties' leases extend years beyond the loan itself, so the structure reads as first-lien money rather than a rescue of a broken asset. The risk is the two-year deadline: the sponsor still plans to sell the properties or place permanent financing before the bridge matures, and a bridge resets the calendar without removing the requirement.
The most useful work sits beneath the loan: folding several old subordinate liens into one junior position gives the senior lender a cleaner line to the collateral and fewer parties to deal with when the new maturity date arrives. Messy stacks slow refinancing decisions, compressed ones make them easier; every claimant with a separate document is a potential roadblock if an extension or sale is needed.
The refinancing wall has lately been handled through modifications and extensions rather than forced marks, and this loan follows that pattern. As this publication has argued in reviewing the CLO market, the missing exits are building the next maturity test. Avatar's $5.1 million bridge is that test at small scale: a sound structure, a functioning asset, and a two-year term that has become the main credit. The loan is not aggressive rescue capital, and 60% LTV leaves cushion for the kind of sale-price miss that has ended many QSR dispositions. Loan-to-value protects the lender against the property; the term sheet is where the risk lives.
Reported by the Real estate debt desk from Connect CRE. Published . Corrections